LIVE Election Coverage: Week of March 13

In Announcements by mdpahlas11 Comments

Join TYT panelists this week for more LIVE
election coverage PLUS stay tuned for
post event commentary.

    • CNN Democratic Town Hall

      Sunday, March 13th at 7:30 p ET

    • Election Coverage

      Tuesday, March 15th at 8:00p ET
      Primaries: Florida, Illinois, Missouri, North Carolina, and Ohio

    Click and watch tytnetwork.com/LIVE
    Missed the live event? Watch past events at tytnetwork.com/specialevents

    Comments

    2. Well, if I did stay at some Holiday Inn Express and was mistaken for someone who was asked to have an intelligible discourse on the matter, all I’m saying is.. I’d hate to be arrested or detained for pointing out NASA’s findings and asking how the matter of causes and to what degree each cause played was concluded.. that’s to me, situational ethics.. so, I’d hate to be arrested if my opinion was wrong.

      1. Unless I am horribly misunderstanding the facts, nobody in this story is suggesting that anyone should be arrested for having the wrong opinion.

    3. disclaimor: I am no scientist, nor do I have any conflict of interest with the fossil fuel industry. but um.. following their logic.. mars atmospheric conditions are martian made? I just won’t links to the 97 of 100 scientist in a room agreeing on anything.

      1. want* not won’t.. i still disagree.. respectfully. Not that polluters should not be guilty of defrauding the environment.. that should be done. EPA I thought regulates just that. Change the fine scheme to fit the corporation so it hurts.. that’s what fines are supposed to do. Ours put small business that didn’t know better out of business while even if enforced, would be laughable by large polluters. So I mean at best.. send the EPA an attachment from the DOJ to help get their crap together.

        1. What do you disagree with? As I understand it, they would go after those that willfully confuse the public so that regulations are delayed. You suggest that they would go after polluters. I think their plan with polluters is exactly what you want. But in addition, the DOJ is possibly going after the ones that use their influence and money to sabotage the political process that should be regulating them.

      2. If you search http://scholar.google.com for “climate change”, you find that there is a lot of discussion about what we should do and how much effect different policies have, and how bad it is. There is no discussion about whether it’s real, or whether we should do something. That has been settled.

        I am a scientist, but not a climate scientist. So I don’t pretend to know all the details. I’m sure there is an explanation for the events on Mars you describe, and I’m also sure it doesn’t disprove the climate change models on Earth. I believe that not because I know anything about it, but because I trust scientists when they agree on something.

        There are lots of interesting phenomena in the world, and many of them seem to contradict things that are true. While it is interesting to find out the details, we don’t need to all be experts on everything. I have other things to keep me busy, so I’m not searching for information on Martian polar ice. But if you want to know, please go look up the details. However, please don’t go around telling people that the scientists are all wrong, unless you have very strong evidence. Given the vast amount of scientists that you disagree with, it is extremely unlikely that you are correct. It’s their job to investigate this, and my experience in the scientific community is that most of us take that job very seriously. I don’t trust every scientist, but I do trust the scientific community when they agree on something.

        About the “bigger fish” argument: why not do both? But also, the government’s job is to make life as good as possible for its people. I would argue that preventing the human species from going extinct should be their top priority.

    4. I love to watch TYT on YouTube usually. I’m a Bernie supporter, and got out and voted for him. I’m a bit concerned that I might be one of the “fucking stupid” people who does additionally believe our DOJ does not have any business playing thought police. There are valid questions raised.. even scientific ones.. such as why does NASA record the same climate control phenomenon happening on Mars [polar ice caps melting, etc.. look it up]. Do we have fossil fuel burning on Mars of which we’re all unawares? I will say no more.. for fear of being thrown in jail, but I think its very dangerous to go beyond freedom of speech and thought police. I’m for REDUCING non-violent prison populations.. that would no doubt increase them.

      1. this comment made in response to https://youtu.be/o6MWktaikLY .. @ 5:42.. and i misquoted.. “fucking idiots” not “fucking stupid” but hey.. one could argue the DOJ will go after the fossil fuel industry only.. not individuals.. but why don’t we set the DOJ free on actually prosecuting gross violations of fraud.. within our government or police brutality? I don’t like giving the DOJ a long leash that some believe could be misapplied to the individual.. so why not fry bigger fish?

      2. @insink71: The answer is simple, but may be uncomfortable for a control freak: the smartest people in the world have looked very carefully at this problem, and concluded almost unanimously that climate change is real and man made. Looking into the questions is always good, but you need very good evidence before suggesting that 97% of the scientists are wrong. My point of view is: I don’t know all the details, but I’m sure they know what they’re doing.

        About prosecuting them: nobody suggests to arrest everyone who doesn’t believe in climate change. What they say is similar to the tobacco fraud: when the oil companies spend a lot of money to confuse people about the issue, they are destroying the planet. Nobody says you should be punished because they succeeded in confusing you. They should be punished. Because there is no doubt that they know better, and they willfully destroy the planet for their profits.

        So this is about going after a handful of people. That is insignificant compared to the prison population and therefore that is not relevant to this issue.

    Leave a Comment