“Fortunately, the district court in Friday’s Sapanaro v. Grindr (D.N.J. Mar. 13, 2015) says no; an excerpt (some paragraph breaks added): After Plaintiff William F. Saponaro, Jr. was arrested for engaging in a sexual encounter with a [13-year-old] minor who used Defendant Grindr, LLC’s online social networking service to arrange the encounter, he sued Defendant for negligence for allowing a minor child to access and utilize its social networking site…. Because Plaintiff’s claim is barred by … [the federal statute] 47 U.S.C. § 230, the Court will … dismiss this action…” *
Cenk Uygur (http://www.twitter.com/cenkuygur) and Ana Kasparian (http://www.twitter.com/AnaKasparian) discuss.