…with embed codes, that is. The massive stock and editorial photo service says people can embed most of its images in their sites at no cost and with no watermarks, so long as they use the provided embed code and iframe. This is of course in addition to more traditional licensing options. Is this a great step for Getty, in a world where photo sharing and editorializing drastically affects their business model? Or is this maybe a white flag from an anachronistic company? Kim Horcher, Tim Frisch, and Jason Inman (youtube.com/jawiin) discuss!
****************************************
SUBSCRIBE and you won’t miss a single Nerd Alert!http://dft.ba/-5yMt
ON TWITTER:
@NerdAlertTYT
@Kimscorcher
@timmyfrisch
@Jawiin
Nerd Alert: Bringing you tech news, gaming, geek culture and more every day of the week with host Kim Horcher and friends. Part of the TYT Network of shows.
http://youtube.com/user/nerdalert
Comments
If you have to use the embed code or iframe, wouldn’t that take you back to Getty? Which would then give them money from their ads if they have any?