Jordan Chariton interviews a woman on why she chose Bernie over Hillary.
0 seconds of 3 minutes, 16 secondsVolume 90%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
Keyboard Shortcuts
Shortcuts Open/Close/ or ?
Play/PauseSPACE
Increase Volume↑
Decrease Volume↓
Seek Forward→
Seek Backward←
Captions On/Offc
Fullscreen/Exit Fullscreenf
Mute/Unmutem
Decrease Caption Size-
Increase Caption Size+ or =
Seek %0-9
Comments
This woman has as what Nina Turner calls ‘Heart-Soul Agreement’.
In other words, INTEGRITY.
When the facts are made plain & bare to her, she aligns properly to the one that tells the truth.
It’s a media thing. For so long, the only way to learn about the world outside of your particular circle was to hear it on radio, watch it on TV, read it in a newspaper, magazine, or book.
Each of those media forms are passive & one-way.
The producer prepares it like a chef & you eat it like a patron.
You eat what they put in front of you & you have little choice in what goes on in the kitchen.
But the internet is TWO-way. Feedback is inherent in this platform.
It’s more like a buffet table where you can pick & choose what you like instead of just being fed a prepared meal. If you don’t like this food source, you have plenty of other selections to fill your plate.
It’s ACTIVE or better yet INTERACTIVE.
The older generations were raised on & are used to the old ONE-WAY media formats.
The newer generations have embraced or were embedded in the new TWO-WAY media formats.
So when this mother who could only know Hillary based on the media presented in front of her as a passive participant…
…talked to her daughter who knows Hillary’s video record based on this media which requires her to be an active/interactive participant…
…it was obvious what the mother had to do because of her own integrity.
The mother knew that she read Hillary wrong & was backing the wrong horse.
Her integrity naturally pushed her to Bernie who says the same things over & over decade upon decade.
And when he was cheated, the mother did the next best thing & moved to Jill Stein like I did.
Her talking about Shirley Chisholm underlined her integrity.
Her values don’t waffle with the changing times. She doesn’t have a public & private view like Hillary.
For this woman, her word is her bond & she must remain tied to her personal integrity & moral fiber.
I don’t think I heard Hillary mention Shirley Chisholm ONCE when going on & on about this First Female President thing.
You would think Shirley would be the first person who comes to mind when talking about breaking that barrier.
But it was for the best because Unbought & Unbossed Shirley didn’t need to be stained with Hillary’s corrupt reputation.
Shirley left politics after the NeoLiberal Clinton takeover of the Democrats in the aftermath of Reagan’s election.
Hillary wasn’t worthy enough to shine Shirley’s shoes.
This was a good video & just another example of why I knew I made the right choice in getting my yearly subscription in 2016 & beyond.
Why didn’t I do it sooner? Better late than never.
John Lucas